2010_5_27_mr_Decatur Co-20
Hot topics
0

Every number has a story: $204.10

Today’s number is $204.10.

But I could have easily selected 36.8% or $83.88 or 16.2%.

Those figures are all different ways to illustrate this truth: cattle health is important… to your bottom line, to carcass quality, to consumer perception.

Yet in recent years, treatment rates in the feedyard have increased—almost doubling in some cases.

Of course markets are always changing, but last year geneticist Holly Neibergs of Washington State University shared that the cost per animal treated for bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is $204.10. Somewhere around 16.2% of feedlot cattle suffer from BRD.

Ryan for blogI talk to a lot of ranchers and a lot of cattle feeders. I’ve never found somebody who says there’s a magic vaccination formula or that there’s a perfect recipe to make sure cattle never get sick.

Instead, I often hear that teamwork leads to improvement.

Take this excerpt from a story I wrote about Nebraska cattle feeders and veterinarians Ryan and June Loseke:

            “You find the longer you’re in practice, the answers are very rarely in the bottle,” Ryan says. “It’s holistic and there are many factors that influence the end product.”

            Most cattle are preconditioned for four to six weeks before they arrive at the feedyard, where they get a 24-hour rest period before processing.

            “We’ve never really had a wreck, but we don’t buy high-risk cattle, either,” Ryan says.

Many share that sentiment of wanting to head off problems before they appear.

At Cattlemen’s College earlier this year Mark Hilton, of Purdue University, said he had yet to meet a feeder who dreams of spending his days treating cattle.

“They hate having sick calves. They want to have healthy calves,” Hilton said, noting that’s his goal, too. “I’m a low-medicine veterinarian. I want to use management instead of medicine and money.”

So it seems we all agree. It’s no fun to have sick cattle and all players must work together to improve that morbidity rate.

So what of that 36.8% and $83.88?

Well, according to data from the Tri-County Steer Carcass Futurity a few years ago, that’s the impact of cattle needing two treatments compared to animals never treated for sickness.

Those that had to be treated twice had 36.8% fewer premium Choice grading cattle (the marbling threshold for CAB) and lost out on $83.88 in grid premiums because of that.

If you need any more reasons to make health a priority, let me know. I’ll send you some more numbers.

May your bottom line be filled with black ink,

Miranda

PS–We’re blogging every day in November. To find out about everything from steak picks to premiums, catch up on our other posts here:

Day one: $6.93

Day two: 2.5 million

Day three: $204.10

Day four: 12.1 million

Day five: 11/13

Day six: 8 million

Day seven: 139

Day eight: $39

Day nine: 30.1%

Day 10: 120 million

Day 11: -2.26

Day 12: 12 to 15 minutes 

Day 13: 30%

Day 14: 32 million

Day 15: $154,000

 

 

blackinkmiranda Visit Website
I love God, my kids, my hubby, rural life, agriculture and working for CAB. I’m officially the director of producer communications, which basically means I get to learn from lots of smart people and pass that information along to lots of other smart people: you. I’m so lucky to work with cattle producers and other folks in this great industry. (Oh, and one more job perk? I get to eat lots of really yummy beef.)
Related Posts
John with ECC group smaller
Every number has a story: 105
img_6482
Dreamers with endurance
A blog-iversary; hits of 2011

Leave Your Comment

Your Comment*

Your Name*
Your Webpage